In re Curtis (24-40459-JTL) 2025-12-19

This came before the Court on the Debtor's motion for the Court to reconsider or vacate its previous memorandum opinion and order in this case. The Debtor argued that the Court made a manifest error in law in annulling the automatic stay and validating the foreclosure of the property at controversy in the case. The Court found, under Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Rule 9023, no manifest error of law or fact was made in the Court's previous opinion. Therefore, the Court denied the Debtor's motion. 

File: 
PDF icon Curtis Memo Op.pdf
Judge: 
Judge John T. Laney, III
Date: 
Friday, December 19, 2025